3 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
'Antietam Battle of Md 1862' in subject Railroads in subject [X]
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
Antietam, Battle of, Md., 1862 (3)
Railroads[X]
Confederate States of America - secession crisis. (2)
Railroads - Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. (2)
Rivers and river valleys. (2)
Bull Run, 2nd Battle of, Va., 1862 (1)
Cedar Mountain, Battle of, Va., 1862. (1)
Cemeteries -- National Cemetery (Grafton, W. Va.) (1)
Cemeteries and cemetery readings (1)
Chattanooga, Battle of, Chattanooga, Tenn., 1863 (1)
Chickamauga, Battle of, Ga., 1863 (1)
Civil War - Ohio 116th Volunteer Infantry, Company J. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 18th Volunteer Infantry, Company B. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 18th Volunteer Infantry. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 36th Volunteer Infantry, Company G. (1)
Civil War - Ohio 36th Volunteer Infantry. (1)
Civil War - Shenandoah Valley Campaign, 1864 (August-November) (1)
Civil War - United States 3rd Artillery Regiment, Company B. (1)
Civil War - Virginia 12th Cavalry. (1)
Civil War - Virginia 13th Infantry. (1)
Civil War - raids and raiders. (1)
Civil War -- Imboden's Rangers (1)
Civil War -- Mosby's Rangers (1)
Civil War -- War diaries (1)
Civil War -- letters (1)
Civil War -- Camps and camp life (1)
Civil War -- Confederate Army (1)
Civil War -- McNeill's Rangers (1)
Civil War battles - Mine Run. (1)
Civil War battles - Rich Mountain. (1)
Civil War battles - The Wilderness. (1)
Civil War battles. (1)
Diaries and journals. (1)
Indians of North America (1)
Missionary Ridge, Battle of, Tenn., 1863 (1)
Politics and government. (1)
Railroad Strike, U.S., 1877 (1)
Railroad workers. (1)
Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) (1)
Romney, WV - Civil War. (1)
Temperance (1)
Veterans. SEE ALSO under Civil War - veterans. (1)
Women -- Societies and clubs (1)
Women's history -- 1850-1899 (1)
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Page: 1