4 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
King andGeorge andCounty in the full text  [X]
Virginia Military Institute Archives in publisher [X]
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives—Confederate in subject [X]
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives—Confederate[X]
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (3)
Virginia Military Institute—Academics—History—19th century (2)
Virginia Military Institute—Faculty—19th century (2)
American Confederate voluntary exiles (1)
Barracks (1)
Chancellorsville (Va.), Battle of, 1863 (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Virginia Infantry Regiment, 15th (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Virginia Infantry Regiment, 56th (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Virginia Light Artillery Battalion, 13th (1)
Confederate States of America. Navy—Officers—Correspondence (1)
Confederate States of America—International relations (1)
Courts-martial and courts of inquiry (1)
Generals—Confederate States of America (1)
Gettysburg, Battle of, Gettysburg, Pa., 1863 (1)
Lexington (Va.)—History (1)
Mexican War, 1846-1848 (1)
Mexican War, 1846-1848—Personal narratives (1)
Mexico—History (1)
Rockbridge Alum Springs (Va.) (1)
University of Virginia (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet life—1860-1869 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1850 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1866 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Curricula (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Faculty—Anecdotes (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Faculty—Biography (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Faculty—Publications (1)
Virginia Military Institute—History—19th century (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Slang (1)
Virginia—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
Washington and Lee University—History (1)
Publisher
Virginia Military Institute Archives[X]
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Page: 1