5 Finding Aids.
Sort by:
Page: 1
Terms
Virginia Military Institute Archives in publisher [X]
University of Virginia—Students in subject [X]
Search
Limit by Facet
Subject
Antietam, Battle of, Md., 1862 (1)
Bull Run, 2nd Battle of, Va., 1862 (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Medical department (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Virginia Cavalry Regiment, 11th (1)
Confederate States of America. Army—Virginia Infantry Regiment, 23rd (1)
Leesburg (Va.)—History (1)
Lexington (Va.)—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
Protestant Episcopal Theological Seminary—Alexandria (Va.) (1)
Secession (1)
Slavery (1)
Soldiers—Virginia—Correspondence (2)
Swarthmore College—Students (1)
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Medical care (1)
United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives—Confederate (2)
University of Virginia—Students[X]
Virginia Military Institute—Academics—History—19th century (2)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet compositions—Poetry (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet drawings (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet life—1850-1859 (2)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet life—1860-1869 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet life—1880-1889 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Cadet life—1950-1959 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1853 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1859 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1864 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1883 (1)
Virginia Military Institute—Class of 1961 (1)
Virginia—History—Civil War, 1861-1865 (1)
Virginia—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives (1)
Virginia—History—Civil War, 1861-1865—Personal narratives—Confederate (1)
Publisher
Virginia Military Institute Archives[X]
Content Warning

ARVAS is an aggregator of archival resources. ARVAS does not have control of the descriptive language used in our members’ finding aids. Finding aids may contain historical terms and phrases, reflecting the shared attitudes and values of the community from which they were collected, but are offensive to modern readers. These include demeaning and dehumanizing references to race, ethnicity, and nationality; enslaved or free status; physical or mental ability; religion; sex; and sexual orientation and gender identity. Many institutions and organizations are in the process of reviewing and revising their descriptive language, with the intent to describe materials in more humanizing, inclusive, and harm-reductive ways. As members revise their descriptive language, their changes will eventually be reflected in their ARVAS finding aids

Page: 1